As You Like It

Infrastructure

infrastructureInfrastructure: A Field Guide to the Industrial Landscape by Brian Hayes, 5/5

I haven’t experienced many books that I would call “life-changing,” but this astounding work is certainly one of the few.  Inexplicably, Hayes is able to take a topic that seems, at best, slightly off-putting, and turn it into 500 pages of some of the most engrossing reading material I have ever encountered.  Covering everything from power plants to mining, his addictive prose entices the reader from fact to fact until it is difficult to even imagine a mindset in which a laden telephone pole does not seem a thing of beauty and a steel mill a thing of wonder.  What could have been the world’s most boring textbook seems instead a labour of love and curiosity, radiating passion and good humour while communicating a staggering amount of information about the inner (and outer) workings of industry.  Even the numerous photos (taken by the author) are noteworthy for their high quality and artistic composition.

So why did I find this book to be life-changing?  In part, because it made me realise that there is no topic either dry or boring, but writing makes it so.  This opens up worlds – no longer do I need worry about finding interesting topics, I only need to find interesting authors.  Secondly, this book opened my eyes to the appeal of industrial structures and the beauty of their functionality.  What was once unsightly (or at least, unseen), such as cell towers, water treatment plants, power substations, overpasses, etc. has a new fascination for me.

It’s certainly not like me to drool praise so lavishly, but there is no denying that Infrastructure transcends my measly five-point rating system and, if there was a higher score than “perfect,”  would surely deserve it.

[Why I read it: it caught my eye as I wandered through the library.]

On Crafting Compliments: Three Simple Facts

With the following realisations, I fancy that I have mastered the art of complimentation.

Fact #1: There is an inverse relationship between how good a compliment is and how statistically likely it is to be true.

E.g. “You are the most beautiful person in the world” is a very good compliment, but also very unlikely to be true whilst “You are more beautiful than Abraham Lincoln but less beautiful than Angelina Jolie” is extremely likely to be true, but…..see Fact #2.

Fact #2: Compliments and insults exist on the same spectrum – a very poor compliment is, in fact, an insult (though the reverse is, strangely enough, not true).

E.g. see example above.

Fact #3: The “I think” qualifier, used by conscientious complimenters to ensure the veracity of their statements, can only be used at the beginning of the compliment, otherwise it becomes an insult.

E.g. “I think your quirky sense of humour is charming” vs. “Your quirky sense of humour is charming, I think.”

The Wit and Humor of Oscar Wilde

wite and humor of oscar wildeThe Wit and Humor of Oscar Wilde edited by Alvin Redman, 4/5

Unsurprisingly, it is Oscar Wilde himself who best summarises the reason why I both love and disrespect him:

Between me and life there is a mist of words always.  I throw probability out of the window for the sake of a phrase, and the chance of an epigram makes me desert truth.  Still I do aim at making a work of art (142).

This small paperback is surprisingly dense, containing a collection of over 1000 Oscar Wilde quotes and excerpts on a variety of topics.  I especially appreciated the inclusion of quotes allegedly spoken by Wilde in conversation, since these are not as readily available as his written works.  I would have given the collection 5/5 if not for the censorious and subjectively judgmental introductions to each section by editor Alvin Redman.  A critique of Wilde’s life and morality would be more appropriate content for a biography and Redman would have done better to merely let the content of the book speak for itself.

The Winslow Boy

winslow boyThe Winslow Boy: A Play in Four Acts by Terence Rattigan, 3/5

I have yet to develop much of a taste for plays, finding that they typically (though of course, not always) have shallow plots and lack character development.  This work is no exception, but I enjoyed the 1999 movie version, starring Jeremy Northam, so much that it was still a fun read.

Bridget Jones’s Diary

bridget jones's diaryBridget Jones’s Diary by Helen Fielding, 2/5

The only thing more disturbing than horrible Bridget Jones and the frankly repulsive contents of her diary is the fact that author Helen Fielding is so very triumphant throughout about how well she has identified with modern, single, female 30-somethings.  I have never read a better case for not turning 30.

The Old Man and the Sea

old man and the seaThe Old Man and the Sea by Ernest Hemingway, 3/5

This short novel is deceptively simple…I assume.  At face value, it seemed to me a rather straightforward and bland story, pleasingly written but almost completely innocuous.  Perhaps other people feel some sort of immediate personal connection to this book, but I felt that the characters were archetypal, the plot slow-moving and the moments of profundity scarce.  During the middle section, I started to grow annoyed that the sole narrative voice was the Old Man talking to himself.

Reading it wasn’t a bad experience and I didn’t hate it, but the main question I’m left with is why is this so famous?  Did everyone have to read it in school because it’s important, or is it important because everyone read it in school?  I just feel like I missed the point somehow.  I guess it’s off to the Wikipedia article to see what the deal is.

Leonardo’s Lost Princess

leonardo's lost princessLeonardo’s Lost Princess: One Man’s Quest to Authenticate an Unknown Portrait by Leonardo da Vinci by Peter Silverman with Catherine Whitney, 4/5

This short book tells an exciting true story and provides a little insight into the world of art collecting and authentication.  For me, the best part was getting some perspective on how art connoisseurs view art.  Reading various analyses of the portrait in question, which called attention to the tiniest of details and were written in terms so passionate as to verge on poetic, was literally eye-opening.  By the end of the book, what had at first seemed to me an attractive, but not terribly fascinating, piece of art seemed worthy of more extended contemplation and I very much enjoyed the heightened sensitivity I felt to this portrait’s great beauty and demonstration of artistic skill.

My only complaint is a petty one – I wish the book’s cover didn’t look so very much like a cheap historical romance novel.  I felt kind of embarrassed reading it in public.

Leonardo, bella principessa

The Sacred Search

sacred searchThe Sacred Search: What if it’s not about who you marry, but why? by Gary Thomas, 2/5

If only this book’s contents lived up to the promise of its subtitle.  Unfortunately, the author focuses less on the “why” and more on outlining a convoluted set of criteria with which to judge the “who.”  This criteria is self-defeatingly simplistic – a Christian couple could check all the right boxes and still end up miserable or alternatively, could meet almost none of the criteria and still have a good marriage.  By preaching to the low-hanging fruit – people who haven’t yet considered the possibility of applying Christian principles, common sense and thoughtfulness to their search for marital bliss – Thomas dilutes his message to an almost unbearably obvious and formulaic level.

The book’s main problem is illustrated by the chapter devoted to helping the reader rate, on a scale of 1-10, six specific character aspects of potential spouses (here’s a hint – you’d better hope for a cumulative score of 45 or higher) (143).  It is a mystery to me how Thomas expects people so clueless that they need to be told to look for a spouse who has high scores in areas like “knows how to communicate” and “resolves conflict in a healthy way” to be capable of making accurate assessments or gaining any value from this exercise.

Less importantly, but still notably, Thomas is one of the most awkward authors I have ever encountered.  Many of the things he writes are unintentionally (I assume) offensive and insulting.  He suggests that, since “most people never use the degree they get from college,” it is reasonable to make finding a spouse there “one of the top goals.”  He actually compares it to an unemployed person visiting a job fair (78).  In a later chapter, he encourages people to play private eye on their intended, using techniques to uncover their past such as asking sly questions, looking at old photo albums, subtly questioning the person’s family and friends, and observing how they pray, since “someone might succeed in lying to you, but it’s a little trickier to present a false front to God” (179-182).  The only strategy he suggests for girls who want to be noticed more is to cook, claiming that guys will “figure out who put the food on the table” (79).  According to Thomas, someone who only reads the Bible during church will have “negligible” spiritual growth and will “never be spiritually wiser than he or she already is” (127).  I’m not trying to nitpick unfairly – there were pages and pages of other equally embarrassing examples that I could have chosen from.

I respect Thomas’s effort to encourage people who are in love to approach marriage in a thoughtful way that is consistent with their religious beliefs and, as far as very general principles and study questions are concerned, his writing has some value.  However, I believe that a lot more value could be had from this book by tearing off the front cover, cutting out a rectangle around the subtitle, handwriting the text of Matthew 6:33 on the back of the rectangle and using it as a bookmark for Book III, Chapter 6 (Christian Marriage), in C.S. Lewis’s Mere Christianity.

Orlando Bloom Has Ruined Everything

orlando bloom has ruined everythingOrlando Bloom Has Ruined Everything: A Foxtrot Collection by Bill Amend, 4/5

This small collection of very funny comics is loosely based on the topic of popular culture ruining fanboyism.  It really resonated with me, given the recent, rampant and painfully mainstream popularity of Doctor Who, Sherlock Holmes, The Hobbit, MMA and geekdom in general.