Thinking, Fast and Slow

thinking fast and slowThinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman, 5/5

Writing in a style that is almost preternaturally coherent, practical and unpretentious, Kahneman examines the workings of the human mind in terms of System 1 (fast, intuitive, automatic) and System 2 (slow, effortful, rational, analytical).   He uses many entertaining examples and experiments to reveal inconsistencies, fallacies and irrationalities in human heuristics, such as:

~What You See Is All There Is (85): automatically assuming that whatever info you have immediate access to is all the relevant info there is.
~Law of Small Numbers (112): underestimating adequate sample sizes by relying on intuition.
~Bias of Confidence Over Doubt (113): a natural tendency towards overconfidence, not doubt.
~Cause and Chance (114): incorrectly identifying random sequences as causal patterns.
~Anchors (119): being unconsciously influenced by irrelevant numbers.
~Availability (129): being influenced by the ease with which specific instances/examples come to mind.
~Representativeness (149): ignoring base rates in favor of merely assessing how well something’s description fits a sterotype.
~Less is More (156): judging a more specific/complicated conjunction of events as more probable than a simpler event.  For example, thinking it is more probable that Linda is a “feminist bank teller” than a “bank teller.”
~Regression to the Mean (175): extreme values are likely to be followed by less extreme values that are closer to the mean.
~Hindsight Bias (202): misremembering one’s past beliefs/thoughts in order to make them consistent with how events actually turned out.
~Illusion of Validity/Skill (209): believing in the validity of one’s faulty heuristics, despite proof of the opposite.
~Intuitions vs. Formulas (222): when uncertainty and unpredictability create “low-validity environments,” simple algorithms are more accurate than “expert” intuitions.
~Expert Intuition (240): intuitive judgment is reliable when it is the result of receiving immediate feedback during prolonged practice in a regular environment.
~Outside View (245): evaluating individual cases in light of existing statistics for similar cases.

^^^ …happened to me almost every chapter.  Seriously, this book is like a manual for the human brain and should be handed out as required reading to all human users.

Advertisements

Your Thoughts

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s